Classic Winnebagos & Vintage RVs

Topic Boards => Info Articles => Topic started by: cncsparky on June 10, 2014, 11:18 PM

Title: Timing and Vacuum Advance 101
Post by: cncsparky on June 10, 2014, 11:18 PM
Written by a retired GM engineer  :)clap

http://chevellestuff.net/tech/articles/vacuum/port_or_manifold.htm (http://chevellestuff.net/tech/articles/vacuum/port_or_manifold.htm)
Title: Re: Timing and Vacuum Advance 101
Post by: circleD on June 11, 2014, 10:14 PM
 :)ThmbUp
Title: Re: Timing and Vacuum Advance 101
Post by: legomybago on June 12, 2014, 10:29 AM
Thats good write up, leans more towards direct manifold vacuum vs. ported. i've always used ported, it's what I know. My first FMC I purchased a couple years ago ran goofy...they had it all out of whack, the carb was toast to start with, the distributor was in 180* off, they had the dist. advance plugged into full manifold vacuum. Well, when you press down on the (dual hydravac) brake system, it takes a fair amount of vacuum out of that motor, and thus changes your idle condition. The engine timing retards so far it barely would run, so I changed it to what I've always known...ported vacuum, and it ran great. I believe there is a rhyme and a reason to both set ups though..